When I did the reading for the rough theatre, I began to
think of our upcoming assignment for the Bolex shoot. We have to do some improvising to make sure
it works out and use things that are not high quality. We use the tools at hand to bring in a second
sensory element to our film, and it can be almost anything we want. Plus, we’re going to be doing this in a
backyard, or somewhere that is not expressly for screenings; I feel that adds a
lot to the feeling of being similar to rough theatre. We’re doing things in a very lo-fi situation,
and it is very similar to what people might do for rough theatre.
I feel that aspects of rough theatre can be applied to
making films as well. Sometimes, you do
not need fancy special effects or CGI to make a good movie. A person can make a truly terrifying horror
film without the need for crazy effects.
Sometimes, all one needs is a scene with low lighting and a person with
some cheesy make up, and one could turn something not scary into a horrific
experience that gives people nightmares.
Reading about rough theatre has helped remind me that sometimes doing
things practically, and sometimes even inexpensively, can produce the right
image. While fancy effects are nice and
can really go a long way to helping make something look good or right, it is
important to remember that doing things on set can be helpful, even if it is as
simple as powdering someone’s face to make them seem unnaturally pale. Rough theatre contains some useful
information for filmmakers, and it is important not to forget the lessons one
can learn from that.
No comments:
Post a Comment